The Trade Agreements Act (TAA) was created to promote fair international trade with certain designated countries. Companies that work with foreign products or services need to know which companies are limited to comply with taA and GSA. The U.S. government was required to purchase only U.S.-made products and services or finished products from TAA companies. The Trade Agreements Act (19 U.S.C. – 2501-2581) of 1979 was passed to promote fair and open international trade, but more importantly, it implemented the requirement that the U.S. government only buy finished manufactured products or certain finished products. This means, in particular, that, under a MAS program, GSA can only purchase products that are compliant in the United States and/or compliant with the TAA. This requirement has always baffled many MAS contract holders as to their actual meaning.
The project indicates a five-day (5) working day from the time the letter is received to respond. The GSA has informed us that it is considering a phased audit plan for contractors with multiple suppliers and many products, but this flexibility may vary depending on the discretion of each contract agent. GSA reserves the right to remove all the benefit! Catalogue of contractors who do not react. However, contractors must be aware that a substantial transformation requires more than just a setup in the United States or a particular country. For example, no significant transformation was found if the components had the same use after assembling or installing another component. To verify that Schedule`s merchandise is GAA compliant, there are several steps that contractors should consider and factors to consider: in early May 2016, the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) informed thousands of Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) contract holders that they were increasingly verifying compliance with the Trade Agreement (TAA) of tariff holders. These notices, which have received extensive coverage in the trade press, require contractors who have certain FSS contracts to verify the country of origin of the products according to their GSA plans and to remove non-compliant products from their schedules. According to GSA, these notices were fuelled in part by increased congressional verification following violations reported to the TAA. Although the notices were allegedly directed towards certain FSS contracts, these notices are an important warning to all FSS policyholders as well as to all other public contractors submitted to the TAA as to the importance of this issue. Indeed, a number of recent cases of the False Claims Act involving the TAA still illustrate the risks and serious consequences for contractors who do not meet these requirements.
Therefore, all flight plan holders and other public contractors subject to the TAA should take this opportunity to ensure that they have appropriate controls in place to ensure that products and services sold to the government are compliant with the AAA. Despite the weakening of the approach, the Trade Agreements Act remains a critical area of compliance and accountability of federal contracting parties, particularly in light of recent publicity in this area.